NATURAL VENTILATION
OF RESIDENTIAL
APARTMENTS
INAPPROPRIATE CONSIDERATION ON VENTILATION PERFORMANCE IN RESIDENTIAL APARTMENTS CAN LEAD TO UNNECESSARY
DIFFICULTIES IN PLANNING APPROVAL AND CAN POTENTIALLY REDUCE ENERGY EFFICIENCY. SITE SPECIFIC WIND TUNNEL
AND NUMERICAL STUDIES CAN OVERCOME THESE OUTCOMES.
Throughout history building designers have
recognised the innate human desire to control
air movement in the built environment and
have incorporated passive design strategies
into their architecture to encourage natural
ventilation. At its most basic, natural
ventilation is needed to remove air from a
building interior and replace it with ‘fresh’
air. In warmer climates natural ventilation
is used to remove accumulated heat gains
during overheated periods, by encouraging
enhanced rates of volumetric air change.
Also important in warmer climates is the
role of ventilation in directly improving the
perception of thermal comfort by occupants
of a space. This is achieved when moving air
passing over the skin aids the evaporation
of perspiration. As long as there is some
air movement, most people will tolerate
higher temperatures before they complain
of discomfort. In this context, ventilation
is intended to achieve useful air velocities
directed over the occupant.
The widespread adoption of air-conditioning
in the second half of the twentieth century
allowed building designers to effectively seal
buildings and instead rely on mechanical
ventilation systems to provide volumetric air-change and thermal comfort to occupants.
In many building sectors architects no
longer considered natural ventilation and
fully sealed the building envelope. In the
residential sector poor design for natural
ventilation could be salvaged through air-conditioning, albeit often a simple package
unit fitted by the resident post occupancy.
In more recent years the green building
movement has recognised the high levels
of energy typically required to drive air-conditioning in buildings and have refocussed attention toward opening up
building facades again to incorporate natural
ventilation. The benefits of natural ventilation
for residential apartment amenity have been
recognised in NSW planning tools, initially
State Environmental Planning Policy 65 -
Design of Residential Flat Buildings and
then through the introduction in NSW of the
more complex mandated sustainable design
compliance tool BASIX. In more recent years
the CSIRO developed a real time simulation
‘network model’ for calculating air flow
rates and incorporated a software module
into the AccuRate heating and cooling load
simulation supporting BASIX. Both SEPP65
and BASIX encourage design for cross-ventilation as a means of assuring natural
ventilation performance.
The problem quickly becoming manifest
is that both designers and planning officers
are applying a rote interpretation of what
constitutes a cross ventilated apartment
simply looking for the openings in two
different facades. Little if any attention
is being paid to whether good natural
ventilation will actually be realized. Worse,
the often acceptable ventilation performance
of single sided units is being overlooked.
To properly design for apartment natural
ventilation requires an appreciation of some
fundamental wind engineering principles.
Wind Engineering consultancy Cermak
Peterka Petersen Pty Ltd (CPP) regularly
conduct combined wind tunnel and numerical
Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD)
studies to determine natural ventilation and
space heat flushing potential of residential
apartments, both dual frontage and single
sided apartment types (Figure 1). CPP
report that natural ventilation and infiltration
through building facades will be driven by
either wind pressure differences across a
building envelope (pressure driven flow) or
by buoyancy effects caused by air density
differences (stack pressure). The greater
the vertical distance between openings the
Figure 1: Contours of velocity magnitude with flow
vectors through the living spaces of two adjacent
single-sided residential apartments as predicted
using CFD.
Figure 2: CPP Project - Daylight Modeling of a
residential apartment
Figure 3: CPP Project - Natural Ventilation flow
vectors predicted by CFD (plan view or residential
apartment left)